Saturday, December 24, 2011

Art ... or Porn ... ?

I admit. I have a thing for body art and tattoos. This, to me, is art. 


Friday, December 23, 2011

Cavendish : Fastest Man In The World : Sports Personality Of The Year ...

He commands Beckham-like levels of fame in Europe. He's won more awards - in Europe - than almost any cyclist, yet until this year in the UK he was less well known, except within cycling circles.

But we knew. We knew long ago. And more importantly, *he* knew. I've never met a man so driven, so 'fuck you, i'm doing it anyway'.

At last night's BBC 2011 Sports Personality Of The Year Award, he not only won, but he won by a landslide, with just a shade under 50% of the total vote. Just deserts, for the first Briton to win the World Road Racing Championship for 46 years and the first ever to win the Tour de France Green Jersey for top sprinter,

For a man labelled as a 'motormouth' he was a little bit shocked, and thoughtful in his acceptance speech. He enthusiastically thanked his team - he always does, in a genuine manner - and went on to say:
“For cycling to be recognised in a non-Olympic year, it's unheard of...it's incredible.The more people who are riding bikes, the more they can appreciate what it means."

"It is not just the Tour de France - one race a year. We are racing 100 days a year. They know what it is to race such distances for such a long time. They appreciate all it takes to do that."

"There couldn’t be a more perfect way to go into the Olympics than as Sports Personality of the country. We go in, it’s the first medal on offer at the Games and everyone is looking at me and my team to achieve that first goal."

"It couldn’t be more fitting that I am doing that with this accolade under my belt."
British Cycling was honoured after the last Olympics, with all those gold medals. (Although strangely, on the track Mark Cavendish was the only member of the squad of fourteen not to win at least one medal.) But in a non-Olympic year, this is epic.


22/12/2011 - the day Cycling became mainstream. And if it inspires a few thousand to get onto two wheels, help the environment, and get healthy at the same time, that's wonderful.

And Cavendish? He's only 26, but he has, I think, his *best* years ahead of him.

Wednesday, December 21, 2011

The Occupy Movement : The Public Perception ...

OccupyLSX has been a whisper in the street.

Since October 15th, as well as regular visits to the @OccupyLSX camp at St Pauls, the @OccupyLFS at Finsbury Square, and more recently the wonderful @BankOfIdeas, I have been engaging, with others, the flood of misinformation on Twitter and other Social Media platforms, as well as promoting the Occupy Movement as a whole; blogging, discussing, following and spreading the news about various issues.

Two things struck me initially, and have continued to do so: The clear public support for the Occupy Movement's position on most of the issues; and the relative *lack* of public engagement on the methods, tactics and strategy used by the Movement worldwide.

In short: They mostly agree with what we say; but they don't always approve of what we do.

Public support, even media support *on the issues* is quite clearly in favour. Early on (17th October), The Guardian polled an 87% 'Yes' in response to the question "The protesters [OccupyLSX] are taking a stand against the bankers and the financial institutions. Are you with them?" [1.]

But strangely, only two weeks later (31st October) The Sunday Times polled only 44% in response to "whether or not they supported the anti-capitalists’ aims" ... without being clear, in the poll, what the aims actually were. It didn't help that the Poll was in Murdoch's Times, of course, nor that OccupyLSX was referred to - again -  as 'anticapitalist'. [2.]

Since then there hasn't been a clear poll taken, but what *has* happened is that mainstream media have finally ended discussion about the protest itself, the Church and the resignations; and started highlighting the root causes behind the protests. Even The Sun and The Daily Mail, this week. All of the broadsheets and many news bulletins are now talking about what *we* have been talking about for nearly 10 weeks, and there is clear public anger over the inequalities in our system, our forms of government, our taxation policies, and almost everything else OccupyLSX has stood for.

But OccupyLSX is still seen by too many as a bunch of (brace yourself) non-working, benefit-claiming, lefty/entitled, smelly, bearded (even the females) socialist/communist lentil-eating sitar-playing borderline-criminal terrorist-agitators. (various descriptions taken from far-too-many vitriolic tweets)

Our public persona has failed. Our most publicly-known spokesperson is probably Laurie Penny. We never intended to be a brand - but we needed an image, and the image we put out there failed to deliver the support that OccupyLSX fully deserved.

So why is that? I would put this down to 5 factors as expressed constantly on Social Media; "We don't 'get' you"; "You're breaking the law"; "You're too few"; "We hear all this about..."; and "You've achieved nothing."

1. They Don't Get Us...

This is because OccupyLSX is protesting in a new way that the general public haven't seen before. They expect us to march, sing and shout - and go home. Occupations and long-term protesting were for the Maze Prison, Greenham Common, and Dale Farm - all over single issues, and all outside the capital, all overlooked (after the first few days) by the media, and hence, the populace.

They fail to understand that the Occupation is an ongoing process, an experimental journey. We're doing things that have rarely been done before, right in the public eye; Creating a community at St Pauls and Finsbury; Taking over empty spaces and using them; all under one umbrella movement.

We march on certain set occasions - and then *go back* to the encampment.

The British people (and all over the world) are struggling to understand this - partially *because* we have failed to explain it properly.

2. We're Breaking The Law...

Hmmm. Tricky one, this. On some things, the Occupy Movement is the *right* side of morality but the *wrong* side of legality. If you're being pedantic. I counter this by comparisons to history - and I think the Occupy Movement has earned that comparison.

MLK
The Tolpuddle Martyrs, The Battle of Cable Street, Womens Suffrage, Ghandi, Martin Luther King and Rosa Parks, Nelson Mandela, Tianemen Square, The Arab Spring, Tahrir Square, Libyan and Syria uprisings.. (feel free to add your own examples); all broke the laws of their countries; because if the laws are wrong, I believe you have a moral *duty* to choose which ones you break and which ones you comply with.

And that list? Everyone on that list is seen - today - as a hero or heroine. Let history judge us, because *no* social change can happen within the rules of the old regimes.

If it was good enough for Mandela...

3. We're Too Few...

The Public read and watch (a little) about London, and perhaps New York. I tell people about the scope of the Movement, and they are always surprised. 'That many?' I hear. Yes, over 951 occupations in 82 countries, at the last count. [3.]

Anonymous say 'We Are Legion'. And we are. Add in those who support in mind but cannot in person; and we are countless.

4. We Hear All This About...

Ask anybody about the Occupation in London and they'll tell you that they know about the 'empty tents'; The faeces in the Cathedral; The drugs, the fighting, the sanitation issues, etc.

The misinformation in certain parts of the media has been apalling. I've spent countless hours online with fellow troll-fighters @YMAHTrolling and @EX fighting these myths, and gradually grinding them down.

Many of the 'Trolls' who intently spread these messages know full well that the myths have already been debunked, yet they continue to do so under their own private agendas, *always* anonymously. The two worst offenders have been 'outed' as expat tax-dodgers, living abroad and working in the forex trading business, not actually paying *any* UK tax, (that would be @fatcouncillor and @MockTheLeft) and having never visited the sites to view with their own eyes. And yet these people are watched religeously by right-wing followers who post on their comments.

But it's harder to fight the misinformation in the mainstream media. We are still referred to as 'anticapitalist' despite the variety of views within the Movement. We have had no apologies forthcoming from those titles who have knowing printed false information. We expect none.

A little truth and balance from the media would be nice, but as the Leveson Enquiry has clearly indicated, we may have to wait a while on *that*.

5. You've Achieved Nothing...

Well, a) We have.. and b) We're just getting started.

Because this is such a radical *way* of bringing the issues into the public domain, I think perhaps many people expected us to get results in a few weeks. I think - I hope - most people within the Occupy Movement have realised that the only way to effect Social Change is not to convince the Governments, or the Financial Institions, but to educate and inform the Public, and get *them* to demand the changes that are required; and the Public Conciousness is a slow-moving beast. But it is gradually rising, sniffing the air and finding that it doesn't like what it smells.

It is a crawl. It's a fight.

But we can display some small wins so far; HMRC's boss will resign, and the Department is being investigated. All Political Parties agree on taking firm action against City excesses. Tax procedures of major companies are under the microscope. The Church has been forced to re-evaluate itself.

People mostly agree with what we say; but they don't always approve of what we do.

But more importantly, people are beginning to question the status quo. And that's a beginning, not an end.

-----------------------

Citations:

1. http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/poll/2011/oct/17/occupy-london-poll
2. http://www.londonlovesbusiness.com/news/occupy-london/londoners-divided-over-occupylsx-says-yougov/913.article
3. http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog/2011/oct/17/occupy-protests-world-list-map

Thursday, December 15, 2011

Tom Cruise Is *No* Jack Reacher ... 'Mission Implausible' ...

If you're hooked on great detective novels .. as I am .. You'll be aware of Jack Reacher. I just *love* these books. I even have the t-shirt.


Reacher is the creation of British-born thriller writer Lee Child, and has appeared in 16 novels so far, all of them best-sellers (the latest, 'The Affair' is just out).

He's a big man, a quiet loner, with mental and physical scars, wandering the US after many years of Military Service, drinking lots of coffee, getting into lots of trouble, solving problems and then moving on.

As the author describes Reacher :

"He was in the machine his whole life. Then the machine coughed and spat him out. Now he takes it easy. He's not looking for trouble. But sometimes trouble looks for Reacher."

The short guy
So many Reacher fans have been waiting for the movie. And here it comes... prepare to be disappointed. Reacher - 6'5", 250 lbs, wide, intimidating, blond-ish, will be played by ... Tom Cruise.

Yup.

Tom Cruise.

A full foot too short, 100 lbs too light and not nearly half as mean.

The template
Let's get an idea of who Reacher should look like, shall we?

When Child was asked a few years ago who he had in his minds eye when writing the Reacher character, he mentioned England Rugby International Captain (and World Cup winner) Lawrence Dallaglio (left). Oh, if only he could act.

Maybe Hugh Jackman would be a good cast. Or Damien Lewis. Jeez, even Vin Diesel.
 
Not Tom Cruise, then.

There's been an huge uproar among Reacher fans over this ridiculous casting. After years waiting for a Reacher movie, perhaps even a series, it looks like a possible franchise (think Jason Bourne) will be stopped in it's tracks by the Hollywood machine, and Cruise's ego. (Mind you, I never thought Matt Damon was right for Jason Bourne either.)

There's even been a Facebook Page been set up : "Tom Cruise is not Jack Reacher".

The blonde
Apparently, Tom Cruise has been rather upset by the criticism, even before shooting starts.

Of course, the movie might just be saved by the casting of the wonderful Rosamund Pike (right) as Cruise's co-star.
 
But the plain fact is, just as Dan Quayle was no Jack Kennedy, Tom Cruise is no Jack Reacher.

You might even call it 'Mission Implausible'.


Monday, December 12, 2011

The #Anonymous 2011 Xmas Video ...

Ethical Hacking Crew 'Anonymous' have released this video as a retrospective on what has been an epic year...

Saturday, December 10, 2011

The Colour Purple ...

Some people have a 'thing' for colour. This lady, for example, clearly adores Purple. Hat, scarf, shoes, backpack - and matching laptop.


Seen in Costa Coffee, Surbiton.


Monday, October 31, 2011

#OccupyLondon : Is It Justifiable To Break The Law For Political Cause ... ?

A respondent on Twitter asked the question above - I replied as follows:

A short response; and probably, a predictable reponse, but : Depends on the law and the political cause.

If a political group firmly believes that their cause is just, and that the laws of a nation themselves prohibit any change, then that group may feel a moral right, rather than a legal right, to break the law for their cause.

Rosa Parks
For example, it was 'illegal' for Rosa Parks to sit at the front of the bus, and Martin Luther King's marches were also against the law. It was illegal for the residents in Cable Street to block the March of the British Fascist Party in 1936. It was illegal (and deadly) for the anti-Communist protesters in Tianemen Square to block the T72 tanks.

History is *filled* with examples of groups of people facing jail to do what is *morally* right.

For many groups, the strong viewpoint is often that either the laws themselves are illegal, or the Government (or corporation) is breaking the laws themselves.

In cases such as these, many protest groups believe that breaking the law is, indeed, an option.

On to #OccupyLSX: I believe that where there is a clash between the *legal* right to protest and the laws *against* certain forms of protest, one has to choose. #OccupyLSX has chosen. The protest is non-violent, and very friendly.


No doubt we will find ourselves in the (very) near future in situations where it is officially decided that we are breaking certain laws. In that case, injunctions will no doubt follow. We will make our decisions as to our response to those demands at the time, in a democratic manner, so that we are all accountable.


Genius: RSA's Animation Of 'Crises Of Capitallsm' ... Must Watch ...

I've posted RSA Animations before, here. ; they're not only beautiful and funny to watch, but they always illustrate so wonderfully the informed lectures that make up their soundtrack.

This one is particularly relevant for today: From June 2010, David Harvey's insightful lecture 'Crises Of Capitalism' was well received at the time - I was in the audience - and I was delighted to find RSA's version of it.

I have no idea who the artist is - RSA don't say. But I love it, and I think you will too.


Tuesday, October 25, 2011

The *Very Unofficial* 11-Point Guide To #OccupyLondon / #OccupyLSX ...


In the last few days I've been involved in so many tweet-battles over my support of @OccupyLondon, in reply to some of the trolls and critics, often answering the same question, repeating the same facts, challenging the same untruths.

So you know who you're trolling
These trolls are very varied - both intelligent and ignorant, both polite and downright aggressive, even threatening.. Like @OccupyLondon, they come in all forms.

So it seemed to me that a 'summary' of the issues over the last few days was in order - from my viewpoint.

I would stress at this point that I hold no official position within @OccupyLondon - these views are mine only, and will be at variance with some (perhaps many) of the rest of @OccupyLondon.

I choose to reply to trolls and critics because I hate to see their tweets unanswered. There's nothing better than to see an ill-judged untruth blown to dust by a solid argument, succinctly put.


A Quick Note First ...

Who am I? See above. I work. I volunteer with a few charities. Sometimes I'm at St Pauls, sometimes Finsbury Square, sometimes I'm in Cafe Nero (not, never St*rb*cks) sometimes I'm at home (I can't be in London 24/7 - so shoot me) ; sometimes I wear a mask, sometimes not. You may never see me.

By the way, when I use the pronoun 'we' or 'us' I'm talking about my understanding of @OccupyLondon. When I use 'I' or 'me' it's my own view.

And if you get into a twit-bitch with me, I'll discuss the issues. Just be polite, non-judgmental, and give me a minute or two between tweets to reply - I'm probably holding many simutaneous conversations, okay? 'Kay.

Ok, here we go ... 

1. So Just Who Are @OccupyLondon ?

@OccupyLondon are a loose alliance of multi-issue groups, with varied agendas, protesting peacefully and legally at two venues, holding assemblies and discussions to try to find solutions to the many problems our country faces.

You can follow them on the Twitter link @OccupyLondon. You can read the statements and various documents at www.occupylsx.org, and I would encourage you to do so - I just *love* arguing with well-informed critics.


2. But Aren't You All Just Unemployed Unwashed Marxist Tree-Hugging Anarchists ?

We are a surprising mix of people, actually. Yes, working class and middle-class (more on that later). We are all ages and cultures. A surprising proportion of us work and pay tax. We have a variety of political aims. Come down and see us if you want visual confirmation.

Just please don't trust the media, or individuals, who have never seen us in the (well-showered) flesh when they call us ALL hippies, benefit claimants, lefties or trouble-makers. Some of us are. Most of us are not. Come see for yourself.


3. But I Hear Only 20% of Your Tents Are Occupied At Night ?

Well, first they said we were all unemployed benefit claimants, then they complain when some of us have jobs to go to, and sleep to catch up on. The percentage of tents unoccupied at night is uncertain as the police have not actually issued the IR images - but certainly, some are vacant.

Some have been left by well-wishing protesters who need to go home.

Others are empty when their occupants are volunteering, discussing, or in other tents. I don't know what time the police flew over the encampments (nobody does - they won't say) but we're nattering late into the small hours, here.

During the day, with so many activities, few of the tents are actually occupied. but there are quite a few day-trippers among our supporters. They have jobs, children, even cats. You wouldn't see a kitten unfed, would you?

It's not as if we demand everyone stay 24 hours for the duration. Just being here one day, and getting involved, is more of an effort than that made by those sitting at home.

Updated 27/10/11

And more recently, this 'empty tents' myth has been debunked by 'Paul Newman' here.

Updated 28/10/11

... and a video released today using the same camera from the same supplier totally destroys the myth of 'empty tents. The suggestion, then is that the 'meejah', well, made up the story. Who'd have thought it, eh? Perhaps the 'meejah' owe #OccupyLondon an apology for their fabrication. But we won't hold our breath.

FURTHER NEWS: #OccupyLondon's lawyers (working pro-bono) have confirmed that they have issued a complaint against the Daily Telegraph (the originator of the story) via the PCC.


4. But Aren't You All Middle-Class Rich Kids With iPods and Lattes ?

Well, I'm not. Actually that's not true.

I do have a smart-phone, and I do enjoy lattes, but I'm a 'Cafe Nero' man rather than St*rb*cks. The Tory 'MP' Louise Mensch (Corby) suggested on 'Have I Got News For You' that any protester with a latte in their cold hands was purchasing a Capitalist product and therefore were being hypocritical. I disagree. We still have a voice even if we have a spare £3 for a latte. We are all types.

That 'obvious reason'
Similarly, why the problem with our smartphones? We have all types here, even a well-set-up Tech Tent. These are the tools of communication in our world. (We're not on Vodafone for obvious reasons, naturally) And my smartphone is neither Apple nor Blackberry, it's an Android, but then I'm a bit geeky.

Are we to have no phones, now? Would you have us naked because clothes are manufactured by corporations? Trust me, you wouldn't want to see that.

Bear in mind that the Anti-Capitalist label plastered all over the media is wrong. I'm happy on occasion to consume the products of our society. I just want to make that society better.


5. So Why Did You Close St Paul's Cathedral ?

We didn't. They chose to close. As to why - that's a good question. I can tell you that there are absolutely NO Health & Safety or Fire Issues.

@OccupyLondon are NOT blocking the entrances, and we have co-operated with our gracious hosts at all times regarding arrangements around the camp. We were dicussing with St. Paul's on various issues - and then they just broke off the dialog without explanation. We suspect that perhaps pressure has come on St Pauls from outside forces but we have no proof of this.

We sincerely hope that St Paul's will reopen very soon. Sadly we feel that they have dug a hole for themselves with their misleading comments about Health & Safety and now have no way out except a rather embarrassing climb-down.

Updated 26/10/11 

Legal expert David Alan Green at the New Statesman wrote an excellent piece  on the whole issue.

Updated 27/10/11 

And on Wednesday, St. Pauls finally announced that they would be re-opening the Cathedral (for your £14.50 entrance fee, of course) on Friday this week, although legal action to forcibly remove #OccupyLondon from the site is being considered. In response to this, the Chancellor of St. Pauls, Cannon Dr Giles Fraser, who has been quite sympathetic to the protest, and who said he'd resign if legal action were considered, is expected to resign.

Updated 27/10/11 

And Cannon Dr Giles Fraser has in fact announced his resignation at 9.00 today (27/10).

Updated 28/10/11 

... followed by a resignation for very similiar reasons by Fraser Dyer, chaplain at St Paul's Cathedral.

Also, of course, I'm please to note that common sense has prevailed and St Pauls re-opened today, further reinforcing the view that it never needed to close in the first place.

Updated 31/10/11

And today, Monday, the Dean of St Paul's Cathedral announced his intention to resign. Rather sad, really. Our battle was never with St Pauls, but their repeated 'own goals' have been a PR disaster from the start.

Both St Paul's and The Corporation of The City of London have been actively progressing their legal action against the Occupation however ...


Updated 1/11/11

Today, St Pauls confirmed they would 'take no part' in the action, and the Corporation of The City of London stated that their action was 'paused for reflection'. In many ways, both organisations have seen that legal action, potentially leading to violence, could easily have been an even major PR own-goal than actually leaving the protests as they are.


6. But Why Are You At St Paul's At All ?

The original intention was to Occupy the Stock Exchange. A swift injuction ensured that we were unable to reach our goal. These things happen, and St Pauls was just around about 100 feet away, in the heart of the Square Mile, surrounded (and sponsored and trustee'd) by financial institutions. We'd rather be in Paternoster Square, but it was not to be. But bearing in mind 'St Pauls Letters' in the New Testament, it seemed a very suitable place indeed.


The second encampment at Finsbury Square is also surrounded by financial institutions. It's a very suitable place to protest, although technically it is also owned by the Church of England.


7. The Media Seem To Be Bashing You Pretty Strongly, Why Should I Support You ?

Yes, well, that's the media for you.

Actually, a surprising number of articles have been written perhaps not in support of our strategies, but certainly in support of our aims - even newspapers on both sides of the political spectrum. The broadcast media don't seem to be very sympathetic, but many of us lost faith in certain aspects of the media long ago.

You have to ask yourself how much of what you read, see or hear is actually true - and of what is true, how it is expressed and what is not shown.

Updated 27/10/11 

The Guardian seem to be quite neutral, even sometimes the Telegraph. The Daily Fail and Express have referred to the protesters using various rather nasty epithets, and Sky News' Adam Boulting referred to the protesters as being as 'bad as Nazis'. Harsh, we thought.

Updated 29/10/11 

Also bear in mind that one of OccupyLondon's main agenda points is Tax Avoidance ; and seeing as though The Telegraph, The Daily Mail, The Express are all owned by tax-dodging non-domiciles, are you surprised at all that they are not supportive.

As for The Sun and The Times, well. Murdock. (Need I say more?)


8. But You Have So Many Voices - What Do You Stand For ?

We are a mixed-issue loose alliance. There are many sub-groups with their own agendas, but we are co-operating and co-ordinating very nicely with each other, thanks for asking. If you want a quick primer on the main issues we are fighting, read this initial statement then follow @OccupyLondon on Twitter for updates.

You'll soon get the idea.

One important fact - we have been labelled Anti-Capitalist. All of us. We are not. Very few of us want to 'eat the rich', 'bring the system down' or 'hang the bankers' - we just want the current system to work better for all of us. We're not scary at all.

Updated 28/10/11

And if you want an example issue, you'll notice from the papers today that while workers are fighting for a measly 2% pay rise, the bosses seem to be doing better - awarding themselves a 49% average pay rise. "We're all in this together" ? I hardly think so.

Updated 31/10/11 

And if you're confused about the *methods* used by the Occupy Movement - remember - it's not your usual protest - see the Guardian article here for an explanation of why we're not who you think we are. People ask 'what's our objective' ? - *I* think it's to provoke knowledge and discussion of the issues. In that, we're already successful.


9. But Isn't This All Rather Pointless ?

Perhaps. Perhaps not. Big changes can start with small groups. Perhaps these are not the right tactics, perhaps they are, but either way, it's a darn sight better than sitting at home grumbling.

Many of us are so ANGRY with the current broken society that we feel we have to do SOMETHING. This is our 'something'. If you have constructive suggestions (not just 'get a job') - we welcome them. Talk to us. We don't bite. Not even if you're rich.


10. What's This 99% Rubbish ? How Can You Claim You Represent 99% ?

Personally, I'm not convinced we do. 99% is a logo (or slogan) we inherited from our American cousins. Think of it like the '57' of Heinz Soups. How many we represent, we don't know, but the only poll available (in the Guardian) stated we had 89% Public Support. If you have any other polls, I'd be glad to see them.

Don't think 99% - think of it as the 'Many Against The Few'. The precise numbers don't really matter. We are legion.

And look at all the cities (1,039) and countries (83) around the world where these occupations are happening. Support world-wide is surprisingly high. Even we're surprised at times.


11. But Aren't You Just Breaking The Law ?

This is a tough one.

We have enshrined in this country a legal right to non-violent protest, although those rights are being eroded constantly. It is one of the many things that we are proud of in this country.

If (and it's a BIG 'if') we are breaking the 'civil law' of trespass (and frankly, even that's debatable) then so be it. It is miniscule when compared to the corruption and law-breaking we constantly see at the heart of Government and Business.

We are non-violent, clean and tidy, and mostly very polite. We have a good relationship right now with the Police and we hope that continues as long as we are here.

We choose to exercise that legal right to protest in our fashion.

-----------------------------------------------

Okay, that's the main issues for now. Any tweet-battles I get involved in might result in one or two additions here, but I'll tweet an update as and when.

We are trying to build a better society. We are starting small, but we will grow. Because we dream, sometimes. You should try it.

Finally, my sincere thanks for reading to this point. I hope you have been enlightened.

A Message From Anonymous (UK) ... A Must Watch ...

Response To Those Who Claim #OccupyLondon Are Just iPad-Using Latte-Drinkers ... ...

Brilliant 'Demotivator' : by 'toxictubes'. Original is here. Click for full-size original.


In Support Of #OccupyLondon ... Excellent photo.

Just a great photo, the original is here.

Wednesday, October 19, 2011

We Are The 1% - Britains Plutarchy ...

"We come from the finest families."

"We went to the finest schools."

"We go to the finest clubs."

"We mix with the finest people."

"We own you. We are the 1 percent."

We are living in a plutarchy : A combination of Oligarchy: (a structure in which power effectively rests with an elite class distinguished by royalty, wealth, family ties, commercial, and/or military legitimacy) and Plutocracy: (rule by the wealthy, or power provided by wealth.)


This is why the 99% are Occupying London, and for those who are confused over the issues, this is OccupyLSX's Initial Statement :

At today’s (October 16th) assembly of over 500 people on the steps of St Paul’s, #occupylsx collectively agreed the initial statement below. Please note, like all forms of direct democracy, the statement will always be a work in progress.

1. The current system is unsustainable. It is undemocratic and unjust. We need alternatives; this is where we work towards them.

2. We are of all ethnicities, backgrounds, genders, generations, sexualities dis/abilities and faiths. We stand together with occupations all over the world.

3. We refuse to pay for the banks’ crisis.

4. We do not accept the cuts as either necessary or inevitable. We demand an end to global tax injustice and our democracy representing corporations instead of the people.

5. We want regulators to be genuinely independent of the industries they regulate.

6. We support the strike on the 30th November and the student action on the 9th November, and actions to defend our health services, welfare, education and employment, and to stop wars and arms dealing.

7. We want structural change towards authentic global equality. The world’s resources must go towards caring for people and the planet, not the military, corporate profits or the rich.

8. We stand in solidarity with the global oppressed and we call for an end to the actions of our government and others in causing this oppression.

9. This is what democracy looks like. Come and join us!

#OccupyLSX on Twitter. OccupyLSX on Facebook.

Saturday, October 15, 2011

The Battle For Blackfriars Bridge ...

Ok, so on Wednesday evening I joined several hundred, possibly 2000, other cyclists in an intentional slow flashride at 20mph (when we could manage it) in protest at the redesign and new speed limits.

This is the 3rd flashride on the site - and here's why:

The limit on the Bridge is 20mph (read: 30mph) As TFL are in the process of a redesign of the traffic layout, they want to increase the limit to 30mph (read:40mph). In line with the redevelopment of Blackfriars Station, TfL is persisting with £550 million re-development plans for the road system, aiming to increase the speed limit from 20mph to 30mph and increase the lanes on the busy thoroughfare from two to three. Several serious crashes have been reported on the bridge this year.

Politicians from all major groups have noted the danger of the current road layout, and Mayor of London Boris Johnson has said more work needs to be done on the accessibility of cycling over the bridge. But nothing has been changed.

Read more here, here, here and here.

Glad Liam Fox Has Gone? Been Replaced By A Tax-Dodger ...


Fox
Ok, so 'Dr' Liam Fox has fallen on his sword, to be replaced in the Coalition Cabinet by ... Phillip Hammond. Let's take a closer look at him, shall we?

Actually, we don't need too, as Channel 4's 'Dispatches' have done so for us, exposing him as a tax-dodger :
"Mr Hammond acted last year to limit his exposure to the new 50p top rate of tax by moving shares in his family property business into the name of his wife, who pays tax at a lower rate. He did so after the 50p rate was announced but six months before it came into effect in April.
"[We] estimate that the move saves him more than £26,000 a year."
Hammond
"[The programme] also says that Mr Hammond, who is worth £7 million, has ‘not received a penny’ from the firm, Castlemead, in salary, instead receiving cash in the form of share dividends – a tax-efficient measure used by the wealthy."
'Plus ├ža change', eh ? Still, it's very hard for PM Cameron to appoint anybody from his current cabinet who isn't a millionaire.

Read more here.

Monday, October 10, 2011

iMac .. iPod .. iPhone .. iTouch .. iSweat ...

It's not all rosy in the 'Apple' garden. Despite the sad death of SJ, there are still too many stories of illegal employer practices at the various locations where iPhones are made.

Block The Bridge, Block The Bill ... Images ...

On Sunday I, along with 2,500 other people, symbolically (and physically) blocked Westminster Bridge, to raise awareness of the actions being taken by the Coalition Government to break up and sell off parts of the NHS to private organisations, Investment companies and hedge funds.


Despite a very minimal police presence, the day was upbeat and fun, lots of music and dancing, and lots of events happening in groups on the bridge, including a London Occupation General Assembly and a Comedy Workshop with Josie Long and Mark Thomas talking about his Peoples Manifesto.

There is a gallery of images here on Picasa.

The next step (ala Occupation of Wall Street) is to occupy the London Stock Exchange. Read here for more.





Sunday, October 09, 2011

Wierd: Poland's 'Crooked Forest' ...

In a tiny corner of western Poland a forest of about 400 pine trees grow with a 90 degree bend at the base of their trunks - all bent northward. Surrounded by a larger forest of straight growing pine trees this collection of curved trees, or "Crooked Forest," is a mystery.


Planted around 1930, the trees managed to grow for seven to 10 years before getting held down, in what is understood to have been human mechanical intervention. Though why exactly the original tree farmers wanted so many crooked trees is unknown. Possible explanations are in the comments here.

It's NOT photo-shopped (or GIMP'd) - see here on Wikipedia.

Oh, And By The Way - Thanks ... !

Just a quick note - thanks to loyal readers who have nudged my blog over the 20,000 mark. Cheers. Not that I'm counting. Well, I am. You lovely people, you.

Random Photo ... Thames Barrier at Dawn ...


Taken last Sunday at 06:50 from Greenwich. Monochromed and cropped, and that's it. Very eerie at that time of the morning.

The London Shine - Overnight Charity Marathon Walk in London ...

Shiners chilling before the start.
What a blast last weekend at the London Shine - London's Autumn Walking Marathon (or Half-Marathon) which started (and ended) at the O2 Arena, and in-between, snaked around Central and South-East London, with thousands of walkers raising funds for various Cancer Charities.

On their way for 26.2 miles!
I was assigned as a Lead Bike (call-sign Hotel Two if you were on the radio circuit that night!) to lead the front walkers, and then patrol to keep an eye out for any medical, traffic, or pedestrian problems, keep an eye on the stewards and report back on issues, etc.

Particularly lively bunch!
Basically I cycled around (mainly) South-East London from 11.30pm Saturday night to 10.30am Sunday morning when we escorted the very last walkers home to the O2 after 26.2 painful (for them) miles. Total distance covered by me was about 55 miles - and then I cycled 18 miles home.

Surviving Breast Cancer.
And I'd rather do that than actually walk the 26.2 miles of the Marathon, frankly. All good fun, though. These wonderful 'Shiners' totally deserved our looking after.

A moving dedication.
All the volunteers - without fail - showed brilliant enthusiasm, even in the small hours of the morning, through 'till dawn, and the finish.

Big thanks, by the way, to the girls at 'Pit Stop One' (including Heidi) who kept me supplied with water, energy drinks, and even a spare McDonalds 'coffee' (well, any port in a storm). Pit Stop Two, as well - even though they had hot chocolate - but no coffee.

For 'Rose'.
How beautiful it was to see so many 'Shiners' wear on their backs a dedication to the people they personally knew, often a family member or friend, who has or had suffered from various cancers. Very moving.

And how inspiring it was to see the tears on the faces of two women I came across, after about 23 miles, in serious discomfort, fiercely determined to limp the final few miles, regardless, because, in one woman's words:
"Pain is Temporary: Achievement is Forever"
Self, just before setting out.
I saw the dawn come up at the Royal Observatory in Greenwich, with a gorgeous view of the Thames Barrier, eating chocolate on a 5 minute break at about 6.50am.

Dawn, Sunday.
And frankly, if you've never seen the dawn come up over the Thames in London, you've never really lived, have you?




[Full image gallery is here. Shiners, see if you can spot yourself!]